ABPA recommends that distributors check structural parts - - ABRN (Automotive Body Repair News)

ABPA recommends that distributors check structural parts

Source: Automotive Body Repair News

Dental Lab Products | E-NewsletterShare This Page:
   

The Automotive Body Parts Association (ABPA) is taking an aggressive path to fix a possible problem in the field as it pertains to the issue of the quality of several potential safety-related crash replacement parts.

The action is being taken in response to the safety parts demonstration by Toby Chess, a veteran I-CAR trainer, at the most recent CIC conference in Palm Springs, Calif., in mid-January.

During the demonstration, which was an extension to one that Chess had presented during the CIC meeting in Las Vegas in November 2009, Chess again showed his audience the difference that exists in the material properties of several crash parts.

This material and/or construction may impact the performance of structural parts in a vehicle collision.

Based on that demonstration and the ensuing discussion of concern at the January 2010 CIC meeting, ABPA has notified its entire membership base that it should review with its suppliers the inherent properties and testing of all structural parts.

This would include bumper reinforcements, steel bumpers, bumper brackets, radiator supports and absorbers to ensure that adequate testing is available to support that both imported and domestic parts perform equal to the OEM in vehicle collisions.

In the event that sufficient testing is not available, ABPA has recommended discontinuation of the production and sale of these part types as well as immediate notification to the estimating systems to eliminate these parts from their parts database submission.

“ABPA and the aftermarket collision parts industry are committed to working with any and all collision repair shops, insurers and related industry groups to assure the continued production and sales of collision replacement parts that are safe and of the highest quality,” says Charlie Hogarty, ABPA board chairman.

National Secretary Danny Morrissey, who is part of a committee to evaluate future action that ABPA can take and who was at the CIC meeting, says, “We are encouraged that Toby Chess' presentation did include positive comments on the testing program and products produced in the aftermarket by an ABPA member company.”       

The majority of ABPA members have long supported certification and testing programs such as the Certified Automotive Parts Association (CAPA) currently in place and which is currently certifying some of these part types and considering certifying other part types.

For more information, visit www.autobpa.com.    

post a comment
Your email address will NOT be published.
appears with your comment
read our privacy policy
Note: does not support HTML
All comments submitted are subject to review, and may be delayed before posting. We reserve the right not to post comments.
Comments from our Readers
 Posted 2010-01-29 16:27:28.0
As far as I 'm concerned, from both the perspective as an industry professional and savvy consumer, only those parts which have successfully passed astringent crash testing and have passed all aspects of strength, rigidity, compression as well as fit and finish will they ne considered as truly Like Kind and Quality to the original manufacturer’s components. This compliance would not only be reserved for “structural crash parts” but for all major panels including hoods and fenders. Until a truly independent laboratory or other sanctioned testing organization (e.g. NHTSA) releases a white paper clearly stating that each specific individual aftermarket component indeed meets the same engineering, material composition and function (energy absorption etc.) as that of the original equipment manufacturer’s parts, the liability cannot be passed on or away from the repairer. Only when these conditions are met would I consider using them on my personal vehicle or anyone else’s, and then too it would have to be substantially economically feasible. Otherwise the risk and additional labor associated with the employment and issues with fit, finish and warranties would not make them a viable alternative to OEM. JMT…Barrett Barrett@AutoDamageExperts.com
 Posted 2010-01-31 17:32:06.0
I read with extreme interest & alarm that any part required to be replaced during the repair process does not mandatorily meet OEM standards. Under the Motor Vehicle Insurance & Repair Industry Code of Conduct, which is a National voluntary Code throughout Australia, it is a requirement that all Parts must meet the manufacturer’s technical specification or any lawful mandatory specifications and/or standards. This is to ensure that the Public are protected, no matter from what "Supplier of Insurance" they invest with, there vehicle repairs are carried out with the objective of restoring the Safety, Structural Integrity, Presentation & Utility of the motor vehicle. This is the fundamental Principal of the MVIRI Code of Conduct. This right to ensure the Safety & Structural integrity of repairs was hard fought for by Repairers throughout Australia & in particular in New South Wales where it has been mandated by our State Government. In fact Insurers will not require repairers to carry out repairs that are not in accordance with this. For a copy of our Code go to www.abrcode.com.au
 Posted 2010-02-01 07:45:00.0
If I read the article correctly the inspection and certification of after market stuctual parts are to be certified by the distributor? To me that is like having the fox guard the hen house. The only testing I would support would be like an independent group and not CAPA as their track record is not the best. What I do not understand is, we routinely buy AM parts ie: tie rod ends, oil/air filters, shocks and such. These parts perform as good or better than OE but when it comes to collision parts the AM parts rarely perform as good as OE. I would like to know why. Now with many door skins being made of HSS with no way to be sure what metal is being used in the parts (without destuctive testing) how is a shop or customer to know what the composition of the AM part is? Come on AM manufactures get going we will buy more of your parts if we knew the quality of the part.
 Posted 2010-02-17 21:03:43.0
We all know that Mr. Chess was using this demonstration as a way to trash Aftermarket product. Let's be real and call a duck a duck.
Read More Comments
Dental Lab Products | E-NewsletterShare This Page:
   
COLLISION COVERAGE
NICB report shows increase in questionable insurance claims, but autobody claims are flat
U.S. House Judiciary Members introduce auto parts bill
Sherwin-Williams to host EcoLean training in Cleveland
Insurance Auto Auctions to sell salvage vehicles to China
I-CAR introduces course, webcast on high-strength steel repairs
COLLISION PRODUCTS
Fabric paint made for carpet and upholstery
Abrasive wheels yield fast grinding action
Chisel provides protection of handle
Camera is high-speed and high-def
Video inspection systems are unique
E-News envelope

Subscribe to ABRN

  • Automotive Body Repair News (ABRN)

  • Our Collision Repair newsletter from ABRN provides up-to-date news, innovative products, technical discussions and shop management features designed to enhance your business. Published every Tuesday and Friday
Source: Automotive Body Repair News,
Click here